If you think food prices are increasing at a much faster pace than what Statistics Canada is suggesting, you are likely not imagining it. For a few years now, many Canadians suspected that the federal agency was either underestimating our food inflation rate or that there was some sort of lag between what was going on at the grocery store versus what was reported. We now know a little more about what is currently happening, at least this year.
BetterCart, a Canadian company that monitors food prices across the country daily, has a slightly different reading of how food inflation is impacting Canadians’ food affordability. BetterCart mines its data from flyers, websites, and several different sources to measure the cost of several different food products. The company has started to compare its data with Statistics Canada’s Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is published every month. In some cases, variances reported by Statistics Canada are higher, but in many cases, they are much lower than what BetterCart is finding.
The investigation is still ongoing, but the evidence that suggests Statistics Canada may be underestimating our food inflation rate is mounting. For example, while the CPI report indicates that the price of ketchup has dropped by 5.9 per cent, BetterCart suggests that Ketchup is up by 7.3 per cent since January. Potatoes are 11.5 per cent more expensive than in January versus the 3.7 per cent suggested by the CPI. Frozen French fries are similarly more expensive. Those products are 26.2 per cent more expensive since January, not 5.9 per cent. Bananas, a very popular fruit, are 4.9 per cent more expensive according to BetterCart, not 0.1 per cent more. Macaroni is up 12.7 per cent versus -3.1 per cent reported ( should this be a negative sign?) by the CPI. Butter offers the most shocking difference. BetterCart believes butter in Canada is up a whopping 35.5 per cent compared to a timid 2.8 per cent. With the ButterGate scandal in the Spring, which revealed how dairy producers were using more palm oil by-products to produce more butterfat, price hikes were expected.
Statistics Canada has a very explicit website describing its methodology and how it accounts for its data capture. The federal agency provides many details about process and reporting, but it never discloses what brands it looks at, what stores, or how the data is being processed in Ottawa, specifically. Another issue is shrinkflation, which is about shrinking packaging sizes and lesser quantities while retail prices remain intact. While Statistics Canada has a complete website about how it measures the impact of shrinkflation, about 70 per cent of products in its food basket have quantities that no longer exist in the market. BetterCart converted market-based quantities with what is being reported by Statistics Canada’s CPI reports to better appreciate the impact of different packaging formats over time.
That said, such an analysis should not be considered as evidence that Statistics Canada is failing at its job. Statistics Canada has a stellar reputation when measuring macroeconomic metrics to give our policymakers, industry, and us consumers alike a better sense of what is happening around us. Most experts and academics here, and elsewhere around the world, rely on our federal agency to tell us what is happening. The CPI is likely accurate about many aspects of our economy. Durable goods, automobiles, energy, lodging, the list is quite comprehensive.
But food distribution is also becoming more complicated as market dynamics are much more intense than they use to be. Market undercurrents in the food sector may be harder to pick up now than five or ten years ago. It is so different.
This is obviously an important issue as most social policies in Canada are influenced by authoritative data. That data is always intertwined with science-based decisions in government to set public programs which are there to offset any negative pressures related to the cost of living in Canada. Currently, Statistics Canada could be underestimating the food inflation rate by at least 1.5 per cent, if not more. A 1.5 per cent increase for an average family of four would represent about $180 to $200 worth of food over one year.
Statistics Canada’s CPI methodology may not require a complete overhaul, but it certainly needs some tweaking. Since prices are changing more quickly these days, some of the data capturing process needs work and certainly more transparency. Statistics Canada claims it changes its food basket constantly, but it still only monitors baked beans as a vegetable protein-based product. For fish and seafood, canned salmon is basically it. Not quite what Canada’s Food Guide is recommending these days.
In recent years, many Canadians have started to read the CPI with some disbelief, especially when it comes to the price of food. Their reality just doesn’t really reflect what they experience at the grocery store. And that could hurt our federal agency’s reputation over time.